String theory landscape

src: societyofmodernastronomy.files.wordpress.com

The string theory landscape refers to the collection of possible false vacua in string theory, together comprising a collective "landscape" of choices of parameters governing compactifications.

The term "landscape" comes from the notion of a fitness landscape in evolutionary biology. It was first applied to cosmology by Lee Smolin in his book. It was first used in the context of string theory by Susskind.

Video String theory landscape

Compactified Calabi-Yau manifolds

In string theory the number of false vacua is thought to be somewhere between 10¹⁰ to 10⁵⁰⁰. The large number of possibilities arises from choices of Calabi-Yau manifolds and choices generalized magnetic fluxes over various homology cycles.

If there is no structure in the space of vacua, the problem of finding one with a sufficiently small cosmological constant is NP complete.

This is a version of the subset sum problem.

Maps String theory landscape

Fine-tuning by anthropics

Fine-tuning of constants like the cosmological constant or the Higgs boson mass are usually assumed to occur for precise physical reasons as opposed to taking their particular values at random. That is, these values should be uniquely consistent with underlying physical laws.

The number of theoretically allowed configurations has prompted suggestions that this is not the case, and that many different vacua are physically realized. The anthropic principle proposes that fundamental constants may have the values they have because such values are necessary for life (and hence intelligent observers to measure the constants). The anthropic landscape thus refers to the collection of those portions of the landscape that are suitable for supporting intelligent life.

In order to implement this idea in a concrete physical theory, it is necessary to postulate a multiverse in which fundamental physical parameters can take different values. This has been realized in the context of eternal inflation.

Weinberg model

In 1987, Steven Weinberg proposed that the observed value of the cosmological constant was so small because it is impossible for life to occur in a universe with a much larger cosmological constant.

Weinberg attempted to predict the magnitude of the cosmological constant based on probabilistic arguments. Other attempts have been made to apply similar reasoning to models of particle physics.

Such attempts are based in the general ideas of Bayesian probability; interpreting probability in a context where it is only possible to draw one sample from a distribution is problematic in frequentist probability but not in Bayesian probability, which is not defined in terms of the frequency of repeated events.

In such a framework, the probability ${\displaystyle P(x)}$ of observing some fundamental parameters ${\displaystyle x}$ is given by,

${\displaystyle P(x)=P_{\mathrm {prior} }(x)\times P_{\mathrm {selection} }(x),}$

where ${\displaystyle P_{\mathrm {prior} }}$ is the prior probability, from fundamental theory, of the parameters ${\displaystyle x}$ and ${\displaystyle P_{\mathrm {selection} }}$ is the "anthropic selection function", determined by the number of "observers" that would occur in the universe with parameters ${\displaystyle x}$.

These probabilistic arguments are the most controversial aspect of the landscape. Technical criticisms of these proposals have pointed out that:

• The function ${\displaystyle P_{\mathrm {prior} }}$ is completely unknown in string theory and may be impossible to define or interpret in any sensible probabilistic way.
• The function ${\displaystyle P_{\mathrm {selection} }}$ is completely unknown, since so little is known about the origin of life. Simplified criteria (such as the number of galaxies) must be used as a proxy for the number of observers. Moreover, it may never be possible to compute it for parameters radically different from those of the observable universe.

Simplified approaches

Tegmark et al. have recently considered these objections and proposed a simplified anthropic scenario for axion dark matter in which they argue that the first two of these problems do not apply.

Vilenkin and collaborators have proposed a consistent way to define the probabilities for a given vacuum.

A problem with many of the simplified approaches people have tried is that they "predict" a cosmological constant that is too large by a factor of 10-1000 (depending on one's assumptions) and hence suggest that the cosmic acceleration should be much more rapid than is observed.

Interpretation

Few dispute the large number of metastable vacua. The existence, meaning, and scientific relevance of the anthropic landscape, however, remain controversial.

Cosmological constant poblem

Andrei Linde, Sir Martin Rees and especially Leonard Susskind advocate it as a solution to the cosmological-constant problem.

Scientific relevance

David Gross suggests that the idea is inherently unscientific, unfalsifiable or premature. A famous debate on the anthropic landscape of string theory is the Smolin-Susskind debate on the merits of the landscape.

Popular reception

There are several popular books about the anthropic principle in cosmology. The authors of two physics blogs are opposed to this use of the anthropic principle.

src: pbs.twimg.com

See also

• Extra dimensions

src: 2.bp.blogspot.com

References

src: i.ytimg.com

External links

• String landscape; moduli stabilization; flux vacua; flux compactification on arxiv.org
• Cveti?, Mirjam; García-Etxebarria, Iñaki; Halverson, James (March 2011). "On the computation of non-perturbative effective potentials in the string theory landscape". Fortschritte der Physik. 59 (3-4): 243-283. arXiv:1009.5386 . Bibcode:2011ForPh..59..243C. doi:10.1002/prop.201000093. 

Source of article : Wikipedia